Don’t Settle Your West Virginia Car Accident On Your Own

Even a seemingly simple case can turn into disaster if you try to handle it on your own.  Imagine settling a case thinking you are all right, only to find out later that you have a serious injury, which resulted from what seemed to be a minor accident.  Unfortunately, you probably have given up all of your rights to pursue an injury claim.  If you have had an accident, which was someone else’s fault, their insurance is responsible for paying all of your damages which resulted from the accident.  You should at least be thoroughly examined by a doctor of your choice before you even think about trying to settle your case.  Even if you do not have any broken bones, cuts, lacerations, or bruises, you may still sustain a soft tissue injury which could lead to long term problems if left untreated.  That is why it is important to be examined by a doctor who specializes in the treatment of these types of injuries and knows what to look for.

At the Manchin Injury Law Group, our attorneys have great experience in dealing with insurance companies and handling these types of cases in court.  The insurance companies use all sorts of tricks and gimmicks to try to get you to settle quickly and cheaply.  The insurance companies have all of the legal help they need on their side and so should you.  If you or a loved one has been injured in an accident, contact the Manchin Injury Law Group at 304-367-1862 for a free consultation.

Posted in Accident investigation, Auto Accident, Car accident, Personal Injury, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

WV Supreme Court: Davis and Chafin will protect your rights

 

 

Every day, corporations and special interests attempt to close Courthouse doors to the hardworking people of West Virginia.  The right to a civil jury trial and access to justice is a crucial issue for which the attorneys at the Manchin Injury Law Group fight on a daily basis.  Injured West Virginians deserve a fighting voice to represent them in the Courtroom, but also deserve a fair mind to hear their case on the bench. In West Virginia, we face a pivotal moment in our judiciary.  Many candidates on the ballot for the West Virginia State Supreme Court of Appeals want to restrict access to justice for everyday, hard working West Virginians.  The make-up of the Court, after this election, could fundamentally change the workings of our civil justice system and has the potential to restrict access to our West Virginia Courts.

Because of this, the attorneys at the Manchin Injury Law Group are pleased to support two candidates for the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals who exemplify honesty, character, and judgment, and who will continue to ensure that access to the courtroom remains open for all West Virginians.

The attorneys at the Manchin Injury Law Group are proud to support incumbent Justice Robin Jean Davis and past West Virginia State Bar President, Letitia “Tish” Chafin for the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals.  Both of these candidates epitomize fairness for all West Virginians and have a marked history of integrity and character.

This election is too important to ignore and the stakes are too high.  Without a fair and honest judiciary who honor an individual’s right to a civil jury trial, injured West Virginians face losing fundamental Constitutional rights.  This is why the attorneys at the Manchin Injury Law Group support Justice Robin Jean Davis and Letitia “Tish” Chafin.  If your Constitutional rights and keeping our court system open is important to you, we urge you to support these candidates as well and don’t forget to vote on May 8, 2012.

Posted in Legal News | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Trial Lawyers Help Keep the Workplace Safe

Recently, the AFL-CIO released its annual study regarding workplace safety.  The AFL-CIO study provides information about each state’s workplace safety records.  Sadly, West Virginia records the nation’s worst workplace death rate.  From the study:

Ninety-five workers were killed in West Virginia in 2010, according to a new AFL-CIO report, “Death on the Job: The Toll of Neglect.” In 2010, West Virginia had a worker fatality rate of 14.1 per 100,000 workers, one of the highest in the country. This compares with a national fatality rate of 3.6 per 100,000 workers. The 2010 Upper Big Branch mining disaster where 29 miners died contributed to West Virginia having the highest rate. North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming and Alaska were among states with the highest workplace fatality rates while New Hampshire, Massachusetts and Rhode Island were states with the lowest rates.

The report notes that in 2010, there were 4,690 workplace deaths due to traumatic injuries and more than 3.8 million workers across all industries, including state and local government, who experienced work-related injuries and illnesses. As a comparison point, in 2009, 4,551 people died on the job.

While these numbers are discouraging, groups like the AFL-CIO as well as other labor advocacy groups and trial lawyers have fought to keep work sites safe.  Many throughout the United States do not realize that trial lawyers and the civil justice system are a crucial part of workplace safety.

When safety rules, either state or national, are violated on the job site, often times people are seriously injured or killed.  When this happens, employers need to be held responsible for not following safety rules.  The fundamental reason for having national entities like OSHA, are to ensure that laws and regulations are in place to prevent workplace injuries and deaths.

When an individual is injured or killed on the job site, a trial lawyer, through the civil justice system, can hold employers accountable for violating safety rules and regulations in Court.  While such actions can never bring back a lost love one or cure a permanent injury, it can help restore an individual’s economic losses and ensure that such a tragedy will not happen to another worker at that job site.

 

If you or a loved one has been seriously injured or killed because workplace safety laws or regulations were violated, the attorneys at the Manchin Injury Law Group can help.  For a free consultation, call us at 304-367-1862.

Posted in Personal Injury, workplace injury | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

WV Senate Bill 211: Making it illegal to text or talk while driving in WV

As many readers of this blog have come to know, starting on July 1 it will be illegal to text while driving in West Virginia or talk on the phone while driving without a hands-free device in West Virginia.  Here is a summary of the key points in the bill:

  • Starting July 1, 2012, it will be a primary offense to text while driving in West Virginia.  This means that an individual can be pulled over and cited for texting while driving.
  • Starting July 1, 2012, it will be a secondary offense to talk on the phone without a hands-free device while driving in West Virginia.  This means that if you are violating another law that is a primary offense (speeding for example) while also talking on a mobile phone without a hands free device, you can be cited.
  • Starting July 1, 2013, it will be a primary offense to talk on the phone without a hands-free device while driving in West Virginia.  This means that an individual can be pulled over and cited for talking on the phone without a hands free device.

Here is the full text of the bill (for a pdf version of the bill click here):

E N R O L L ED
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE
FOR
COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE
FOR
Senate Bill No. 211
(BY SENATORS KESSLER (MR. PRESIDENT) AND HALL,
BY REQUEST OF THE EXECUTIVE)
____________
[Passed March 10, 2012; in effect ninety days from passage.]
____________
AN ACT to amend the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, by
adding thereto a new section, designated §17C-14-15, relating
to traffic safety; establishing the traffic offense of operating a
motor vehicle while texting without the use of hands-free
technology; establishing the offense of operating a motor
vehicle while using an electronic communication device
without the use of hands-free technology; defining terms;
providing exceptions; clarifying means of enforcement as a
primary offense; impact of violation on insurance coverage;
impact of violation on law enforcement ability to seize or
confiscate device; requiring signage on certain highways for
motorists entering state; providing penalties; providing for
increased fines for multiple offenses; assessing points against
driver’s license for multiple offenses; exempting offense from
the assessment of court costs and fees; and limitations.
Enr. Com. Sub. for Com. Sub. for S. B. No. 211] 2
Be it enacted by the Legislature of West Virginia:
That the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, be amended
by adding thereto a new section, designated §17C-14-15, to read as
follows:
ARTICLE 14. MISCELLANEOUS RULES.
§17C-14-15. Prohibited use of an electronic communications
device driving without handheld features; definitions;
exceptions; penalties.
(a) Except as 1 provided in subsection (c) of this section, a
2 person may not drive or operate a motor vehicle on a public
3 street or highway while:
4 (1) Texting; or
5 (2) Using a cell phone or other electronic communica6
tions device, unless the use is accomplished by hands-free
7 equipment.
8 (b) For purposes of this section, the following terms shall
9 mean:
10 (1) “Cell phone” shall mean a cellular, analog, wireless
11 or digital telephone.
12 (2) “Driving” or “operating a motor vehicle” means
13 operating a motor vehicle, with the motor running, including
14 while temporarily stationary because of traffic, a traffic
15 control device, or other momentary delays, but does not
16 include operating a motor vehicle after the driver has moved
17 the vehicle to the side of, or off, a highway and halted in a
18 location where the vehicle can safely remain stationary.
19 (3) “Electronic communication device” means a cell
20 telephone, personal digital assistant, electronic device with
21 mobile data access, laptop computer, pager, broadband
22 personal communication device, 2-way messaging device,
23 electronic game, or portable computing device. For the
24 purposes of this section, an “electronic communication
25 device” does not include:

(A) Voice radios, 26 mobile radios, land mobile radios,
27 commercial mobile radios or two way radios with the
28 capability to transmit and receive voice transmissions
29 utilizing a push-to-talk or press-to-transmit function; or
30 (B) Other voice radios used by a law-enforcement officer,
31 an emergency services provider, an employee or agent of
32 public safety organizations, first responders, Amateur Radio
33 Operators (HAM) licensed by the Federal Communications
34 Commission and school bus operators.
35 (4) “Engaging in a call” means when a person talks into
36 or listens on an electronic communication device, but shall
37 not include when a person dials or enters a phone number on
38 a pushpad or screen to initiate the call.
39 (5) “Hands-free electronic communication device” means
40 an electronic communication device that has an internal
41 feature or function, or that is equipped with an attachment
42 or addition, whether or not permanently part of such
43 electronic communication device, by which a user engages in
44 a call without the use of either hand or both hands.
45 (6) “Hands-free equipment” means the internal feature
46 or function of a hands-free electronic communication device
47 or the attachment or addition to a hands-free electronic
48 communication device by which a user may engage in a call
49 or text without the use of either hand or both hands.
50 (7) “Texting” means manually entering alphanumeric
51 text into, or reading text from, an electronic communication
52 device, and includes, but is not limited to, short message
53 service, e-mailing, instant messaging, a command or request
54 to access a World Wide Web page or engaging in any other
55 form of electronic text retrieval or entry, for present or
56 future communication. For purposes of this section,
57 “texting” does not include the following actions:
58 (A) Reading, selecting or entering a telephone number, an
59 extension number, or voicemail retrieval codes and com60
mands into an electronic device by the pressing the device in
order to initiate or receive a phone 61 call or using voice
62 commands to initiate or receive a telephone call;
63 (B) Inputting, selecting or reading information on a
64 global positioning system or navigation system; or
65 (C) Using a device capable of performing multiple
66 functions, including fleet management systems, dispatching
67 devices, smart phones, citizens band radios or music players,
68 for a purpose that is not otherwise prohibited in this section.
69 (8) “Using a cell phone or other electronic communica70
tion device” means holding in a person’s hand or hands an
71 electronic communication device while:
72 (A) Viewing or transmitting images or data;
73 (B) Playing games;
74 (C) Composing, sending, reading, viewing, accessing,
75 browsing, transmitting, saving or retrieving e-mail, text
76 messages or other electronic data; or
77 (D) Engaging in a call.
78 (c) Subsection (a) of this section shall not apply to:
79 (1) A law-enforcement officer, a firefighter, an emer80
gency medical technician, a paramedic or the operator of an
81 authorized emergency vehicle in the performance of their
82 official duties;
83 (2) A person using an electronic communication device to
84 report to appropriate authorities a fire, a traffic accident, a
85 serious road hazard, or a medical or hazardous materials
86 emergencies.
87 (3) The activation or deactivation of hands-free equip88
ment or a function of hands-free equipment.
89 (d) This section does not supersede the provisions of
90 section three-a, article two, chapter seventeen-b of this code
91 or any more restrictive provisions for drivers of commercial
motor vehicles prescribed 92 by the provisions of chapter
93 seventeen-e of this code or federal law or rule.
94 (e) Any person who violates the provisions of subsection
95 (a) of this section is guilty of a traffic offense and, upon
96 conviction thereof, shall for a first offense be fined $100; for
97 a second offense be fined $200; and for a third or subsequent
98 offense be fined $300. No court costs or other fees shall be
99 assessed for a violation of subsection (a) of this section.
100 (f) Notwithstanding any other provision of this code to
101 the contrary, points may not be entered on any driver’s
102 record maintained by the Division of Motor Vehicles as a
103 result of a violation of this section, except for the third and
104 subsequent convictions of the offense, for which three points
105 shall be entered on any driver’s record maintained by the
106 Division of Motor Vehicles.
107 (g) Driving or operating a motor vehicle on a public
108 street or highway while texting shall be enforced as a
109 primary offense as of July 1, 2012. Driving or operating a
110 motor vehicle on a public street or highway while using a
111 cell phone or other electronic communication device without
112 hands-free equipment shall be enforced as a secondary
113 offense as of July 1, 2012, and as a primary offense as of July
114 1, 2013 for purposes of citation.
115 (h) Within ninety days of the effective date of this
116 section, the Department of Transportation shall cause to be
117 erected signs upon any highway entering the state of West
118 Virginia on which a welcome to West Virginia sign is posted,
119 and any other highway where the Division of Highways
120 deems appropriate, posted at a distance of not more than one mile from each border crossing, each sign to bear an inscription clearly communicating to motorists entering the state that texting, or the use of a wireless communication device
124 without hands-free equipment, is illegal within this state.
125 (i) Nothing contained in this section shall be construed
126 to authorize seizure of a cell phone or electronic device by
127 any law- enforcement agency.

The Joint Committee on Enrolled Bills hereby certifies that
the foregoing bill is correctly enrolled.

The attorneys at the Manchin Injury Law Group are committed to the safety of all West Virginians.  In an effort to end distracted driving and to help West Virginians comply with the new West Virginia law, the Manchin Injury Law Group will be giving away one hands-free device every week.  Visit our website or the Manchin Injury Law Facebook page for more information.

 

Posted in Auto Accident, Car accident, distracted driving, West Virginia Legislature | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Battle of the Sexes: The Distracted Driving Wars

The article below comes from enddd.org- an excellent resource on the fact surrounding the dangers of distracted driving.  The article outlines statistics from a recent AAA study:

AAA recently conducted its first in-car camera video study to measure the driving habits of young drivers.   The study, Driving Among Newly Licensed Teen Drivers, reveals that teenager girls are more distracted while driving than their male counterparts.   Compared to teenage boys,  while driving, teenage girls were shown to be:

  • 50% more likely to use a cell phone or electronic device
  • 50% as likely to reach for an object inside the car
  • 25% more likely to consume food or beverages

Boys however were 50% more likely to turn around in their seats than their female counterparts.

What this study shows us is that while teenage boys and teenage girls exhibit different behaviors, they are all exhibiting similar behaviors.  They’re all driving distracted.

This behavior became worse as the amount of teens in the car increased.  In AAA’s study, when  young passengers were in the car, distractions increased through loud conversations and horseplay in more than 50% of the observed situations.

On the other hand, the distractions decreased and the young drivers were more focused when an adult was present in the car.

For more information, please visit: www.TeenDriving.AAA.com

If you or a loved one has been injured to to someone’s distracted driving, the attorneys at the Manchin Injury Law Group can help.  For a free consultation, call 304-367-1862.

To sign up for a hands-free bluetooth headset that the Manchin Injury Law Group will be giving away once a week, visit our Facebook page and enter the hands-free drawing.

Posted in Auto Accident, Car accident, distracted driving, Personal Injury | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Fatal work injuries are increasing

The civil justice system is important in many different aspects.  One such aspect is to ensure that employers and work-places follow important state and national safety rules that are implemented to keep employees safe.  Unfortunately, not all employers follow these safety rules, causing serious injuries and fatalities to employees.  Below is a video describing workplace injuries and how the attorneys at the Manchin Injury Law Group handle these cases.

New numbers released yesterday by the Department of Labor suggest that in 2010, fatal work-place injuries rose by 3% over 2009.  These numbers were reported by the Center for Public Integrity along with the following:

 

The Department of Labor reported today that 4,690 U.S. workers suffered fatal injuries in 2010, a 3 percent increase from 2009.

The higher number in part reflects a string of high-profile disasters in 2010: An explosion at the Upper Big Branch coal mine in West Virginia that killed 29; BP’s Deepwater Horizon blowout in the Gulf of Mexico, which killed 11; and a blast at the Tesoro Corp.’s oil refinery in Washington State that killed seven.

Even discounting the 47 deaths from those three events, the toll rose in 2010. In 2009, 4,551 workers died, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

The fatality rate rose slightly as well, from 3.5 fatal injuries per 100,000 full-time equivalent workers to 3.6.

The number of workers killed in fires or explosions jumped from 113 in 2009 to 191 in 2010. Work-related transportation deaths increased from 1,795 to 1,857, suicides from 263 to 270.

The number of construction-related deaths fell from 834 to 774 — a probable reflection of a weak housing market and a generally rotten economy in 2010.

“It’s disturbing that there hasn’t been any improvement in workplace fatalities in several years,” said Peg Seminario, director of health and safety for the AFL-CIO. “It seems like progress has stalled.”

Seminario said she wouldn’t be surprised to see the 2011 fatality numbers go up, given that the economy began to pick up steam last year. “We’ll be looking carefully not only at the numbers but the rates,” she said.

The BLS data release — an update of preliminary numbers put out last year — comes three days before Workers Memorial Day, an international event, started by labor unions, honoring those who have been killed on the job.

Among those who died in 2010 was 19-year-old Emilio DeLeon, who was electrocuted in a construction accident in Grand Island, Neb. His father, Albert, was in Washington last week to attend a Senate hearing on worker safety and put a statement into the record.

“Our family has been to therapy to help us cope with the loss of our son,” DeLeon’s statement reads. “The pain and loss is present when I go to sleep and is there when I wake up in the morning. I have lost my Dad, Mom and Sister, and I have to tell you that losing my Son is the worst feeling I have ever had to endure.”

The construction company that employed Emilio DeLeon was fined only $16,600 for his death by the Labor Department’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration, even though OSHA had cited the firm for serious safety violations four months prior to the fatal accident. “They were allowed to continue with business as usual,” Albert DeLeon wrote in his statement.

In an email to the Center for Public Integrity, OSHA said:

“On average more than 12 workers die on the job every day, and that reality continues to drive the work of the Labor Department. When the Occupational Safety and Health Act was passed in 1970, the National Safety Council estimated that 14,000 workers died each year on the job. Now, with a workforce that has doubled in size, the annual number of fatalities has dropped significantly. But it’s not enough. We cannot relent from our enforcement of laws that keeps our nation’s workers safe. One worker killed or injured on the job is too many.”

If you or a loved on has been injured because of a workplace safety violation, the attorneys at the Manchin Injury Law Group can help.  Our attorneys have the experience and understanding of many complex legal issues to hold employers accountable for violating safety laws.  For a free consultation, contact us at 304-367-1862.

Posted in Personal Injury, workplace injury | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

In the News: Marion Co. Law Group Joins “One Text or Call Could Wreck It All” Campaign

From WDTV’s evening news on April 23, 2012:

For the news report click here.

The anti-texting bill was officially signed into law earlier this month, and since then we’ve been telling you about many schools and organizations that have been pledging to stop distracted driving now.
The Manchin Injury Law Group announced today, that they’ve joined the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s “One Text or Call Could Wreck It All campaign” to help stop distracted driving.The group is now pledging their support to help make our roads and communities safer, and help spread the message that distracted drivers are not only a danger to themselves, but to everyone else on the road as well.

In 2009, nearly 5,500 people were killed, and a half million more were injured in distracted driving crashes. That means 20 percent of all injury crashes that year involved distracted driving.
Manchin Injury Law attorneys say they’ll help teach the community on the dangers of texting and driving, before it becomes illegal this July.

“Particularly young people are very tempted it seems, or inclined, to text while driving. I think the average is like four and a half seconds per text, and at 55 mph, you travel the length of a football field. So you can imagine what can happen in a second or two, let alone the length of a football field,” said Timothy Manchin, Attorney at Manchin Injury Law Group.

To learn more about the “One Text or Call Could Wreck It All” campaign, visit manchininjurylaw.com, and they’ll also be giving away a hands-free blue-tooth device to a new person every week who registers on their site.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment